Tuesday, September 22, 2015

U. S. Army needs leaders with moral strength

There has been a convergence of related stories.

As reported by Fox News, the Army is discharging Sergeant First Class Martland on 1 November (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/22/army-rejects-appeal-from-soldier-kicked-out-after-confronting-accused-afghan/?intcmp=hpbt2).  His crime?  A physical altercation with a notorious Afghan militia commander who kept a young boy chained to a bed as a sex slave.

This comes on the heels of a New York Times editorial speaking to reports that soldiers were "told to ignore" sexual abuse and the rape of children by Afghan militia and police (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/22/opinion/ignoring-sexual-abuse-in-afghanistan.html?ref=international&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=Moth-Visible&module=inside-nyt-region&region=inside-nyt-region&WT.nav=inside-nyt-region).

It is absolutely unbelievable that the U. S. Army leadership is discharging a combat decorated Green Beret for asserting American values in a combat zone, for taking action that may have saved the rape victim and prevented future rapes, and for doing the morally right thing.  It is incredible that no senior Army leader, uniformed or civilian, has shown the moral courage to step in and stop this miscarriage of justice.  From my perspective, it seems they are more concerned with getting the next star or promotion, than they are in displaying such moral courage.  For the spineless general officers unwilling to come to the defense of SFC Martland, I say, "If you do not have the moral courage to do what is right in garrison in a political matter, then it is clear you do not have the physical courage to lead soldiers in combat."  They should all be forced out of active duty.   

For the Pollyannas of the world, men of moral strength and courage at times have to step forward and take physical action to stop the abuse of others.  This is what occurred, according to reports, when Special Forces Captain Quinn and Sergeant First Class Martland confronted the Afghan militia commander with allegations that he had raped a boy and beaten his mother.  Reportedly the Afghan confirmed the allegations and laughed at our American soldiers.  At that point Quinn and Martland took physical action to educate the Afghan that his behavior would not be tolerated.  The result?  Quinn and Martland were relieved and sent back to the states.  While Quinn subsequently left active duty, Martland intended to remain, though the Army initiated discharge proceedings against this solider who has served his nation for 11 years.

In spite of Representative Duncan Hunter, Marine Corps combat veteran, coming in hard supporting Martland, an Army memo informed the soldier his appeal of the discharge has been denied.

Where is the moral courage we demand of our leaders?  Where is the Army senior leadership in this case?  Where is the Secretary of the Army?  Where is the Secretary of Defense?  It is patently offensive for these leaders to wax and wane in their comments about sexual assault in our Armed Forces, then do nothing to prevent the discharge of a soldier determined to stop the sexual assault of children by an Afghan militia commander.  The lack of action in support of SFC Martland is the height of hypocrisy and demonstrates a clear lack of moral courage.

For those throwing out the tripe that child rape is an Afghan cultural issue, into which our soldiers are not to insert themselves, let us remind them of all the comments made by senior military leaders and some elected officials about the imperative for our Armed Forces to be models of American values wherever they serve.  Certainly, taking the culture of the foreign nation into account is important.  But some acts are so egregiously contrary to American values that action by good men is required.

Unfortunately, the good men of which I write do not include the senior, uniformed and civilian, leadership of the United States Army.   

Monday, September 21, 2015

Planning for and enjoying retirement



Retirement is and should be the opposite of what some see as a full time vacation. It is not perpetual play, nor should it be. It is a meaningful time in one's life for which planning in advance is advised. Like most things in life, if the plan is simple, realistic, and practical, its implementation will provide for success.

The planning, of course, will likely center on financial and health matters. Can't spend what you don't have and can't spend at all if in ill health. Taking these two matters into account in the pre-retirement planning makes possible true enjoyment of the actual retirement.

For the sake of this post, it is assumed one has properly addressed the financial and health aspects of retirement. So now here are key elements for the retired years: maintenance, physical, intellect, and giving back.

Maintenance refers to those necessary activities required for our day-to-day lives. Mowing the lawn, cleaning the house, doing the laundry, shopping for groceries, etc. While these activities are present pre-retirement, once in retirement we have far more flexibility on when we undertake them. Instead of being more or less forced to do the grocery shopping over the weekend or on the way home from work, we can now choose a more convenient and less crowded time. The maintenance activities will still need to be completed, but in retirement you can flexibly control the when.

Physical refers to strenuous physical activity and exercise. Pure and simple, without daily strenuous physical activity and exercise, health issues will be more frequent and severe as we age. Find those physical activities that provide aerobic and anaerobic conditioning, and that you enjoy (or at least can tolerate). Dedicate the time each and every day to completing them. Further, including competitive sports is also highly recommended. Not only will it add to the physical exercise routine, but will also provide a social outlet.

Intellect refers to daily intellectual pursuits. Reading, writing, debating, solving the New York Times crossword puzzle. Find and undertake enjoyable intellectual activity that is as strenuous for your mind as is the physical exercise you undertake daily for your body. Keeping the mind active is crucial to a long and happy retirement. So as not to be confused, watching television, mindlessly surfing the Internet, and similar activities are not intellectual activity.

Giving back simply refers to finding a volunteer activity that provides some challenge and accomplishment. Strongly suggested is a volunteer activity that includes interacting with others, such as being a mentor or tutor. There is not enough to be said for giving of some time each week to assist in an area of passion. By products of giving back can be the joy of social interaction with others, as well as intellectual stimulation.

Scheduling physical exercise and intellectual pursuits on a daily basis, combined with regular weekly maintenance and giving back activities will permit time and space to pursue those activities that provide personal pleasure; avocations if you will. If fortunate, the physical exercise, intellectual pursuits, and giving back may also fall into the category of avocations. So much the better.

Travel. Painting. Riding a Harley. Gardening. Walking on the beach. Fishing. Whatever activity provides that pleasure you seek from retirement can be enriched by maintenance, physical, intellectual, and giving back activities. It is neither feasible nor realistic to plan to spend eight hours per day in pursuit of your avocation. But, it is entirely possible to enjoy your avocation as part of the other activities comprising a happy retirement.

With this simple approach, retirement can be fulfilling and thoroughly enjoyable.

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Sad state of American politics

American politics are certainly in a sad state, when the two candidates running for President that are leading in the respective party polls are Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

Neither individual is worthy of the office.

Neither political party is well represented by either individual.

Sad, sad state of American politics.

Sunday, September 6, 2015

By peddle or throttle

Definitely a benefit of living in SoCal is pursuing the two wheel lifestyle.

Whether as a cyclist...



Or a biker...


It is great being rolling long on two wheels, by pedal or throttle.

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Bikes, not balls

It is the first Saturday in September and the sun is shining and the temperature promises to be near perfect outside.  So naturally my thoughts turn to bikes, not balls.  Footballs that is.




The local and national TV stations (is the phrase "TV station" even relevant with the advent of cable TV?) are all atwitter (no, not that kind of twitter) at the beginning of professional and collegiate football (not to be confused with the round football known everywhere else in the world).  Sports writers and commentators wax eloquent about season predictions, this or that player, coaching moves, and (heaven to Betsy) "deflate gate."  (The only deflating that concerns me involves the two tires on the Harley in the garage.)

The obscene amounts of money involved in both professional and collegiate football mightily add to my lack of enthusiasm, in spite of all the hoopla being generated in print, on line, on TV, and on the radio.  And from a purely sporting perspective, a football game is rather boring.

According to a 2010 Wall Street Journal study mentioned in this article (http://www.nationalsarmrace.com/?p=475), of the 60 minutes allotted for play in a football game, there is an average of 11 minutes of play.  It was also reported a 2014 game had 152 advertisements, more than the number of plays from scrimmage.  (152 advertisements goes to the earlier observation about the obscene amounts of money in the sport.)  So, if the entire time at the stadium or watching on TV equals a rough average of three hours for football (180 minutes), the 11 minutes of play comes out to roughly 6.1% of action.  So, yes, football is rather boring.

Conversely, 180 minutes out on the Harley are not boring.  Whether on the freeways or back county roads, riding for three hours is an engaging, exhilarating experience, enjoyed (by the way) at a fraction of the cost of attending a football game.

So, after cleaning up and having breakfast and a cup of coffee, it will be bikes, not balls this Saturday.


Thursday, September 3, 2015

State of California public education

According to Wikipedia, California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) is a requirement for high school graduation in the state of California, created by the California Department of Education to improve the academic performance of California high school students, and especially of high school graduates, in the areas of reading, writing, and mathematics. In addition to other graduation requirements, public school students must pass the exam before they can receive a high school diploma."  Wikipedia also shares the following data, which was provided by the California Department of Education. 

Percentage of 10th graders passing the test on their first attempt
School yearPassing math testPassing English test
2003-200474%75%
2004-200574%76%
2005-200676%77%
2006-200776%77%
2007-200878%79%
2008-200980%79%
2009-201081%81%
2010-201183%82%
2011-201282%79%
2012-201385%83%

But this conflicts with passing rates reported for the summer of 2014 by KQED, "According to state data, last summer 4,847 math tests were given with 1,286 (26.5 percent) students passing and 5,826 English Language Arts tests were given with 1,248 (21.4 percent) students passing."
The above are brought to attention, because of an article about how California is scrapping the CAHSEE (http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelreagan/2015/09/03/draft-n2047514).

I'm not sure which figures are correct, but the following are certainties.  The exit exam can be taken beginning in the sophomore year, seriously calling into question how such a test can evaluate what knowledge and skills a California student is expected/required to acquire by the end of four years of high school.  And, whatever the design or intent, according to the above article, the exit exam has been done away with, also seriously calling into question the exam, its construct, and the effectiveness of California public education.

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Obama's false claims display ignorance

President Obama has on multiple occasions declared, self righteously in my view, that the war is over. In October 2011; "We've ended the war in Iraq," Obama said at a June 25, 2012; and in May 2013 he declared the global war on terror is over.

Despite these and other similar declarations, combat has not ceased, thus displaying Obama's fundamental ignorance of national security and warfare.

It is no secret that Obama has approved continued combat missions and strikes by manned and unmanned aircraft, all the while uttering false claims that the war is over.

Combat manned and unmanned strikes are acts of war, pure and simple. The definition of war is not exclusively linked to an infantryman holding a rifle and engaging the enemy. Let us be absolutely clear about this point. Aerial bombardment is war, pure and simple.

Tell the English they were not at war during World War II, as Germany used manned aircraft and missiles to bomb their cities.  There were no German troops attacking London during the Blitz.  It was war from the air.

So President Obama simultaneously declares he ended the war in Iraq, while he authorizes and even brags that military forces (manned and unmanned aircraft) are striking targets there and elsewhere.  His spokespersons have even lauded the recent approval by Turkey to use their facilities to continue this warfare. 

Such gross ignorance of national security and warfare can be no clearer than that demonstrated by his false claims.

When the first pilot flying one of these combat missions is killed or captured, when the first soldier or Marine is killed or captured in Iraq, what will Obama claim?  Will he deny to the family of the fallen or captured that their husband, son, brother was at war?  If one of our military is captured, will Obama declare he/she is not a Prisoner of War (POW)?

His ignorance would be laughable if the subject were not so deadly serious.