Showing posts with label national service. Show all posts
Showing posts with label national service. Show all posts

Thursday, September 7, 2017

Poignant

In addition to this blog, I do a little free lance writing, mainly about veterans and motorcycling.  Doing so brings me into contact with some truly amazing people, including Marine Corps veteran Ana Sanchez.



A veteran of our most recent wars, it was my honor to interview her, which produced this article.  It tells her story, including being a member of the Marine Corps Female Engagement Teams in ground combat, thus earning the unique recognition of being a Lioness.

Most sadly, Ana passed away recently, succumbing to cancer and leaving behind her husband, a daughter, and a son.

Her passing underscores that there are fantastic people who come into our lives, if only for a short period.  They are extraordinary, simply because they are average, patriotic folks like most of us, working hard to live happy and productive lives day-to-day.

They are not individuals written about by the main stream media.  They are not people about who various pundits and self-appointed experts speak.  They are not the rich and famous.  They don't travel in limousines or chartered aircraft.  They don't appear on talk shows.    

They are our fellow Americans, pure and simple, who have served their country.  They do not seek handouts.  They stand when our National Anthem is played.  Their families are the centers of their lives.

They are male, female, white, black, Asian, Hispanic, Native American.  They come from every part of the country.  They like all kinds of music.  They live in blue states and red states.

Remember, I suggest, these folks when tempted to complain about this or that.  The paths of our lives cross for a bit, adding richness to each.  This is the human experience and deserves recognition.

Just as Marine Corps combat veteran Ana Sanchez deserves our respect for her service.  Her life mattered, not just to her family and friends, but to our nation as well.

Semper Fidelis 

  

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Mandatory National Service

Published views advocating national service of various types have surfaced, including from General McChrystal, Eric Navarro, and Karen Whitney.  They are on the right path, but don't take the concept far enough.  

The nation needs to implement mandatory national service for all able bodied citizens.  Underscoring the last word, mandatory national service and its ensuing benefits must be available only to citizens of the United States of America.

At age 18 or 60 days subsequent to graduation from high school, whichever occurs last, all able bodied citizens will be required to serve a period of three consecutive years of mandatory national service.  All forms of national service will include introductory in residence training, aka "boot camp."  This introductory training is described later. 

National service will include serving in one of the existing programs, some of which will be converted from volunteer status, for example:


  • Armed Forces
  • Peace Corps
  • Greatly expanded Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA)
  • US Army Corps of Engineers
  • National Park Service
  • Fish and Wildlife Service
  • Bureau of Land Management
  • US Forest Service
  • US Geological Survey
  • National Resource Conservation
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency
  • US Bureau of Reclamation
  • Americorps
  • Volunteer Generation Fund per Serve America Act
  • Americorps National Civilian Community Corps
  • Volunteers in Service to America
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency Corps
  • Note: State and local governments may choose to opt in, by providing state and locally funded positions ccomparable to those listed above.

Every component of the national service will include the following ancillary elements during introductory training, which will be conducted at residential sites (as done by the military during basic training):

  • Personal financial management training.
  • Consumer skills training, such as house buying, car buying, comparison shopping, credit card management, Internet security, etc.
  • Citizenship skills training, such as applying for employment, resume construction, job interview skills, filing tax returns, voting, etc.
  • Remedial English language arts, math, and writing for those identified by entry level evaluation during introductory training.
  • Administration of interest inventories to help our citizens identify for which fields of employment they are best suited. 
  • Applying for college or trade schools.
  • GED certificates for those who have not graduated from high school.
  • Internships with applicable businesses.  


Only upon successful completion of a three consecutive year stint in national service will citizens be eligible for:

  • Federal student financial aid,  
  • Federal grants of any kind,
  • Federal unemployment insurance,
  • Federal health care subsidies,
  • Federal employment,
  • Federal home loans, 
  • Election/appointment to federal office, or
  • Any of the 2,302 forms of assistance listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.   

In addition to the above direct benefits, other indirect benefits of mandatory national service include:

  • Identifying as American citizens.
  • Earning federal benefits.
  • Earning employment experience.
  • Learning workplace teamwork.
  • Leadership.
  • Exposure to individuals from outside of ones immediate environment.
  • Contributing to the nation, leading to developing citizenship. 
  • Gaining three years of crucial maturity before entering higher education, trade schools, or the employment market.
  • Exposure to different parts of the country.
  • Exposure to various fields of employment.
  • Development and enhancement of adult social skills.
  • Learning which fields of employment may suit the citizens best.
  • Learning to manage personal finances.
  • Reduction of student debt.
  • Preparation for higher education or trade school.


This program employs our youth as soon as they have completed or departed high school, provides skills often noted as missing in the entry level workforce, enhances academic skills where needed, directly contributes to the welfare of the nation, builds effective citizenship, and breaks from the current approach.  Federal benefits will be earned, rather than simply provided, and citizens will identify as Americans.  


Saturday, April 30, 2016

Make military service a mandatory requirement for eligibility

We need a change to the eligibility requirements for high level elected federal offices, such as President, Vice-President, members of the Senate, and members of the House of Representatives.  Due to the extraordinary impact these individuals have on all facets of national security, to be eligible for these crucial offices, the laws should be changed to require satisfactorily and honorably completing at least three years of active duty in the nation's military.

According to a Fox News Report, "The 2012 election marked the first time in 80 years that neither major party presidential nominee had served in the military.  Two years later, the 114th Congress was sworn in with the smallest proportion of veterans on record. According to an October 2015 Congressional Research Service report, the high point was reached in the 92nd Congress (1971-72) when 73 percent of Congress had served in the military.  Today, veterans make up 20 percent of the Senate and just 18 percent of the House of Representatives."  And, "On Capitol Hill, veterans are even underrepresented among congressional staffs. Justin Brown, the founder of HillVets, told FoxNews.com vets account for approximately 3 percent of congressional staff members, a figure that reflects the high barrier they face."

These numbers reveal the exceptional disconnect between the nation and its military. With less than one-half of one percent of the nation's citizens currently serving in the military, the lack of understanding of the military is astounding, even dangerous.  Moreover, the disconnection makes it all too easy for our elected leaders to send our men and women into harm's way.  For example, the recent POTUS announcement that 250 more members of our military are being sent to Syria. (Can anyone remember the mission creep in Vietnam?)


With presidents allowed to send our military into combat without a declaration of war, under the pretense of spurious and inexact Congressionally approved Authorizations to Use Military Force (AUMF), the seriousness of such action is not debated by those who have actually served our nation in uniform.

Stop this practice and immediately enact laws mandating satisfactorily and honorably completing at least three years of active duty in the nation's military to be eligible for election or appointment to our highest elected federal offices: President, Vice-President, members of the Senate, and members of the House of Representatives.

  

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Monday, December 21, 2015

Before deciding to use military force UPDATED: 12-31-15


The incessant presidential campaigning and terrorist attacks across the world and at home prompt all matter of candidates and talking heads to advocate employing some variation of military force. Setting aside, for the moment, that some candidates ignorantly and narrowly define war and combat solely as large numbers of infantry "boots on the ground" in some foreign country, employing military force to attack and kill others is war. It is war, whether the weapons originate from ground, naval, or air forces in numbers large or small. It is war, no matter how candidates and posers may want to state or nuance otherwise. And going to war is an action so serious that the Constitution reserves to Congress the authority to declare war. Sending our armed forces into harm’s way in the absence of a declaration of war, as done over the past several decades under multiple congresses and presidents, has proven to be folly time and time again. Three actions are required by our country to correct the all too frequent contemplation of and ultimate use of military force.

If a matter of national security warrants use military force, Congress must be involved and pass a declaration of war. Absent the commander-in-chief authorizing repulsing an immediate threat or attack on our nation, the nation must join in the decision to use military force through Congress. The unsatisfactory trend of resolutions or authorizations for the use of military force short of declarations of war must end.

Men and women have been sent to fight and die, during times the electorate was deeply divided as to the justification. In my lifetime, whether it was Vietnam or Iraq, the nation was not certain the decision was the right one. And since Congress was not asked to declare war, the use of authorizations short of a formal declaration of war diminished what authority was provided the presidents, who essentially exercised unilateral decisions regarding employment of military force.

Declaring war, by its very nature, is accorded the pinnacle of seriousness it warrants. To expend blood and treasure in defending the nation, including meeting approved treaty obligations, is the most important action undertaken by the president and Congress. Sadly, it has become banal and trivial in the political spectrum, due to the lack of congressional accountability. Declaring war means the nation is willing to do whatever is required to win, as the nation willingly undertakes the sacrifices necessary for achieving unconditional victory. All elements of national power are brought to bear. Every family contributes, some more than others. But for far too many decades, only some families contributed, as currently seen by one-half of one percent of the nation serving in the armed forces.

So, update, reinstate, and activate the military draft. Members of Congress and the presidents do not have "skin the game," as the saying goes. Except for the occasional, rare volunteer, the sons and daughters of members of Congress are not likely to go in harm's way as a result of the so-called authorizations for use of military force. It is so easy for politicians to send your son or daughter to war, when not sending their own. To correct this, revise and activate the military draft to (1) include females as well males, (2) eliminate loopholes used by the sons and daughters of the privileged and wealthy to avoid military service, and (3) select a true cross section of American citizens for mandatory military service of a minimum of three consecutive years of active duty. It is also a matter of national equality.

Equally important in ensuring congressional and presidential understanding and appreciation of what it means to declare war, amend the Constitution to require all members of congress, the president and vice president to have served at least three consecutive years of honorable active duty in the armed forces to be eligible for election or appointment. If the civilian leadership is empowered with the power and authority to declare war, then it must have a working knowledge of the armed forces based on personal experience. Simply put, if a citizen wants to serve our nation as president, vice president, or member of congress, then he/she must first serve the nation as a member of its armed forces. This is also a matter of equality.

In sum, if circumstances warrant deciding to use military force, Congress must debate and vote to declare war. In order to ensure equal representation of the people in this most serious of actions, revise and activate the military draft. And amend the constitution to mandate a minimum of three consecutive years of honorable military active duty as an eligibility requirement for the offices of president, vice president, or member of congress.


UPDATE: 12-31-15

This New York Times offers the same opinion as expressed above: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/27/opinion/sunday/a-fearful-congress-sits-out-the-war-against-isis.html?hpw&rref=sunday-review&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well

Sunday, November 15, 2015

Paying for a college/university education

At the beginning, the following are stipulated:
  • Earning that first undergraduate degree remains a solid predictor of future success.
  • The cost of obtaining that first undergraduate degree has unreasonably risen over time.  One major contributing factor, seen first hand as a staff member at two public universities, has been the enormous increase in administrative personnel on campuses, particularly in senior positions.
  • Too many students enter colleges and universities inadequately prepared for the rigors of undergraduate studies, ultimately prolonging their studies or resulting in dropping out.
  • Too many universities, particularly in urban settings, require students to reside on campus, at a much higher cost.
  • Too many students are ill advised, both before and after beginning their studies as to which major they should pursue.  Consequently, time and money are wasted in classes outside of the requirements for the eventual majors the students pursue, contributing to four year degrees now taking between five and six years to earn. This, of course, directly impacts student debt.  If it takes 50% more time to earn a degree, the cost rises at least another 50%.
  • Too many colleges and universities offer majors that do little if anything to prepare degree earners for future employment.  Consequently, students leave with large debts and have significant difficulty finding meaningful employment.
  • Too much, way too much, of the financial aid models rely on loans, either student or parent.
  • Post secondary education is focused too much on being a business, rather than providing schooling.
How to pay for that first undergraduate degree?  Several, including some running for president, advocate having the American taxpayer pick up the tab.  News flash, it is not the task or role of the government to provide post secondary education.  Nor is it the role of government to provide jobs.  (For another view on government supported post secondary education, look at the option provided at the end of this piece.)

One route to pay for college is to work for it.  That is, the student works and earns the money to pay the costs.  It has been and is possible.  By no means is it easy.  And it requires tremendous self discipline, concentration, time management, and (at times) creative scheduling.  I know.  I did it.

My family could not afford to pay for my education, so it was known well in advance that I would have to foot the bill.  I began saving, by working after school, on the weekends, and over the summers of my junior and senior years in high school.  Although I could have attended a lower cost public university, I chose a more costly private one, meaning that I would have to work while attending school.  First in a grocery store, then in a restaurant  and finally in an auto center, my freshman year was difficult.  I stuck it out, and stayed with the company running the auto center for the remainder of my four year pursuit of that BA degree.  

I carried a full load (16 hours/4 classes) and worked full time (minimum of 40 hours per week).  Finding the right job with the right scheduling flexibility was key of course.  In addition to working every Saturday and Sunday, I worked three of the weekdays, normally always on Friday.  With an understanding boss, I took the late shifts each of those weekdays, attending classes in the morning and then heading off to work.  Of course, during the summers I worked the full 40 hours, with some rare overtime thrown in.  I found a way to make it all work and do not feel I missed out on any of the important college experiences.  

I was not in a fraternity, so that distraction didn't exist.  I did have a steady girlfriend (more on that in a bit), so didn't miss out on the romance.  I also was known to attend the occasional party or concert with my classmates, so didn't miss out on the social life.  For the first two years, I lived in the dorm.  For the last two, I lived out in town.  Up front, I won't claim to have been an outstanding student, but I was passing.

In addition to carrying the full load and working full time, my girlfriend and I married in the middle of my junior year at age 20.  There I was, married, carrying a full load, and working full-time.  The bills were being paid, with roughly 57% of my monthly take home going to the university.  Another 23% went for the one bedroom apartment.  The remaining 20% of my take home paid for food, gas for the one car (a clunker), and all other bills.  I did not seek loans.  I did not receive scholarships.  We were not racking up debt.  In fact, we were saving a little bit every month.  

In my senior year, my wife did get a minimum wage job, which made our lives easier.  We moved into a nicer place.  And we could afford a once monthly trip the best pizza place in town.  Normally, Saturday nights were either with friends playing cards or watching TV in that little place of ours.  When the clunker broke down, I walked to and from school and work.  Begrudgingly, we dipped into our savings for a down payment on a used car.  Nothing fancy, just basic transportation.  At work, I had earned small raises over the nearly four years.  Nothing huge, but every little bit helped.

After four years, I graduated with a BA degree.  We were debt free and had some money in the bank.  Determination.  Self-discipline.  Time management.  Some luck.  Delayed gratification.  And a very, very supportive wife.  It was and is possible.  

And there were so very many intangibles that we realized by the route we took.

At graduation, I had a solid six years of employment (full time employment) history, adding together that of my junior and senior years in high school with the four years while in college.  My contemporaries were lucky to have sporadic summer employment.  I had learned how to work for supervisors, accept criticism, and improve my performance.  After a while, I also learned lower level supervision.  We knew how to manage our personal finances, never bouncing a check or missing a payment.  That in turn built a solid credit history.  We knew how to purchase and sell an automobile.  We knew how to budget our resources.  We knew how to enter into a lease.  I knew how to manage my time.  I appreciated the value of hard work.  I learned no job was beneath me, having swept floors, taken out trash, unloaded trucks, shoveled snow to clear paths for the customers, stocked shelves, and run a cash register.  I learned the responsibility of managing a cash box so it perfectly balanced each and every day.  I learned how to work with the public and my co-workers.  And I learned how to earn the respect of others by the quality of the work I did.

All of this and I had my degree.

It is possible to work your way through school, finishing not owing anybody anything, and having grown into a responsible adult ready to tackle the world.     


============================================================================
So you want the government to pay for your schooling?


President Obama and others are touting another expensive, unfunded taxpayer supported program.  This one addresses paying for a college education - America’s College Promise.  It would provide for two years of “free” community college education to all.   (Of course, nothing is really free.)   In recent commentary, Dr. Carroll, chancellor of the San Diego Community College, voiced support for the plan, by (among other points) citing the historical example of the post World War II GI Bill as an illustration meant to justify the president’s proposal. 

One major issue, however, exists in citing the WWII GI Bill (or the Post 9/11 GI Bill for that matter) as justifying the president’s proposal.  After WWII, the nation decided the GI Bill recipients had earned its financial support for higher education by honorably serving their nation in the armed forces during wartime.  There is no such requirement for serving the nation in America’s College Promise.  It is just free money.

There is no doubt paying for college is challenging.  If the nation believes it is critically important to incur more national (and state) debt in order to expend federal (and state) tax dollars to pay for or defray the costs of a college education, then loosely citing the post WWII GI Bill and its relative the Post 9/11 GI Bill for justification can be instructive.  Specifically, in order to receive this new benefit, the recipients must first earn it.

Just as soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines earned the benefits of the various GI Bills, let the intended citizen recipients of America’s College Promise earn it by satisfactorily completing three years of mandatory national service to begin upon graduating from high school.

The nation can greatly benefit from mandatory national service for all able-bodied citizens.  It was estimated that in 2014 approximately 4.1 million students started high school.  For the purposes of this piece, it is estimated that 15% of that student population would eventually be ineligible for mandatory national service for a variety of reasonable causes.  Based on this estimate, there would be roughly 3.5 million citizens eligible for mandatory national service beginning in the summer of 2018. 

Imagine how nearly 3.5 million young citizens can serve their nation, performing all manner of things that directly benefit their fellow citizens, while gaining many direct and indirect benefits.  From national defense to working in federal parks, the participants will serve across the nation for the benefit of its people.   

At age 18 or 60 days subsequent to graduation from high school, whichever occurs last, all able bodied citizens will be required to serve a period of three years mandatory national service.  Said national service would include serving in one of the existing programs (some of which would be converted from volunteer status), such as but not limited to the following: Armed Forces; Peace Corps; greatly expanded Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA); US Army Corps of Engineers; National Park Service; Fish and Wildlife Service; Bureau of Land Management; US Forest Service; US Geological Survey; National Resource Conservation; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency; US Bureau of Reclamation; Americorps; and Federal Emergency Management Agency Corps.  It is also offered that national service could support state and local programs benefitting all citizens.

Only upon satisfactory and successful completion of the three-year stint in national service would these citizens have earned and be eligible for a variety of direct federal benefits, such as federal student financial aid and, should the nation decide it is justified, America’s College Promise.  By their national service, the citizen recipients earn the educational benefits from their nation. 

Along the way, they would also receive indirect benefits, such as employment of an important segment of the population at a critical point in their lives (according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in July of 2014, only 51.9% of youth were employed at this normally high water point of summer employment); an early employment history; acquiring skills for personal financial management, which will have long term benefits for the nation; promotion of equality, because everyone serves; realizing critical maturity prior to attending post secondary education or entering the work force; learning service above self; instilling a work ethic and teamwork; and instilling national pride.
If satisfactorily completing mandatory national service is not embraced as a prerequisite for America’s College Promise, then the program should not be approved.  The nation cannot and should not provide “free” benefits.