As I start writing this post, the country music station began a song that begins with the words, "Something about a truck..." Ah yes, manly pursuits.
This morning at 0445 (4:45 AM for my civilian friends), my Marine buddy pulled up in his pick-up truck. We loaded my fishing gear along side his and headed out for a lake east of here. Definitely a manly pursuit. Two retired Marines, a pick-up, and fishing.
We arrived just as the sun was rising. A clear, beautiful day. The lake, nestled among tall pine trees, awaited us. A few hawks and other birds were already in the sky, no doubt looking for their breakfast. Otherwise near silence. We parked the truck in a little camp ground, then grabbed our gear and headed down to the water's edge. The temperature was perfect for wearing a sweatshirt. Not cold and not hot. Eagerly, just like the youngsters we once were, we took our positions and geared up the rods and reels. Finding the right rock on which to stand. Studying the water to decide where to make that first cast. Two guys on the water, looking to hook into trout for dinner. A manly pursuit.
Once we had rigged our lines, each of us made that first cast into the water. It is truly a special moment, when you see the line sail out, then see the bait and weight drop into the water. I'd spent a lot of time preparing the fishing gear, which is a collection from my childhood and my parent's gear. Pop is gone and Mom doesn't fish any longer. Several rods and reels, plus tackle boxes, and other odds and ends. The items collectively and individually evoke memories of the countless days I spent fishing with my father, and family. That first cast today reminded me of all the days we'd spent fishing during my upbringing. The early mornings, up on the river on the mountain. Great times...manly pursuits.
As I was laying out the gear last night, I decided to take two rods and reels. The first was the last set up my dad purchased. It has a special meaning, because he had purchased it in 1980. That summer, we'd returned from overseas and were staying at my folks' place. Shortly after getting home, I told my dad we expected to go up on "the river," as we referred to the area we went fishing. However, he stated he couldn't go, because of his health issues (poor heart, poor circulations, etc.). I responded that I was going up the next morning, no matter what. Imagine my surprise, as I came down stairs to find him dressed, the fishing gear laid out, lunch made and packed, and the coffee ready. He said he'd go with me, but probably wouldn't fish, because he couldn't climb up and down the river banks anymore. Well, we went up the river and had a great time time. In the days, weeks, months, and years that followed, he and Mom went fishing many, many times. They also took our family, introducing my children to the river that I learned to love as a child and teen. Anyway, after that morning up on the river, he went out and bought a new rod and reel, a great set up for trout fishing. I remain convinced that going up on the river on the fishing trips added years to his life. He passed a number of years ago and this was my first trout fishing outing in decades, so it seemed right to take his rod and reel for the outing.
Carrying his rod and reel reminded me of growing up with my father's guidance, teaching, and example, as we enjoyed fishing. Sometimes with the family. Sometimes,, just the two of us. Manly pursuits. Talking about everything under the sun. Using fishing as an outlet, such as going out the day after I broke my arm for the sixth time and learning I would have to undergo corrective surgery at age 14. There was just something about hitting the river and learning how to revere nature and act like a man on the mountain. As I made that first cast today, I felt as if I were in the perfect place that fishing can take you. I also sensed my dad would have been smiling as I flipped that nightcrawler out into the lake. It epitomized the manly pursuit of enjoying nature, being out with a good buddy.
After a few strong bites, I'd missed hooking any fish. But it looked promising. Then my Marine buddy Pat said, "It's about time." He'd hooked a nice sized trout. I grabbed the net as he tried to maneuver the fish to the bank. I got down to the water's edge and was trying to scoop the fish up in the net. Then the fish got off the hook and I blew it, letting the fish get by me. Damn! I let my buddy down, because I didn't get the fish into the net. (I offer that men get upset when they let down a friend. As a man, it is important to support your friends and be there for them, even in something as relatively minor as getting a trout into the net. Unfortunately, way too elected officials [such as the current POTUS] have absolutely no understanding of this manly concept.) I felt horrible. But Pat is a great buddy and promised that it was OK, though he'd use this episode to pimp me for years to come. As men, we continued fishing, convinced that we'd bring home a good string of trout.
Some time later, a duck and a white goose swam up in front of us, maybe five to six feet out from the bank into the lake. Swimming in front of us, they were honking and being a distraction. At this point, we each had our lines out in the lake, with the rods set into the rocks to prevent them from falling into the lake. Then, without warning, the goose starting flapping its wings and prepared to starting flying, sort of running along the surface of the water. At first I thought it was great, that they were leaving. Then I stared as the goose caught up in my line and the rod and reel were yanked into the lake. Shouting, "There goes my rod and reel," I watched as they were pulled into the water and disappeared. Pat turned just in time to see them disappear. We both raced to the water's edge, but couldn't see the rod and reel. The goose was gyrating around, with the line wrapped around its neck. After it went further and further into the lake, its gyrations finally resulted in freeing it from the line. The end result was pulling the rod and reel so far that we'd never get them.
After being momentarily speechless, we looked at each other and started laughing. And laugh we did, until our sides hurt. Though sad at loosing my father's rod and reel, the entire incident was so unusual, so unexpected, and so surreal, we had to laugh. Then, of course, the barbs started flying my way. "Damn, can't you hold on to your gear?" Of course, I had the perfect couple of comments for our wives. My buddy would say, "Dang, but he lost the one fish I hooked today." I could then respond, "Lost a fish? Well, let me tell you how I lost my rod and reel!" I figure he'll yank my chain about it for years to come. Manly pursuits!
Friday, May 17, 2013
Thursday, May 9, 2013
The Benghazi talking points
I watched the recent hearings with interest, then read most of the reputable on-line reports concerning them. Having some experience with the labyrinth of the national security interagency community and its processes, there is an area desperately needing answers.
We've been shown copies of the draft talking points in their doctored forms. These talking points, made infamous by Ambassador Susan Rice, had the truth excised.
The answers we, the American public, need will tell us who -- specifically -- made, directed, and/or approved the massive changes to the talking points?
In addition to the abysmal and unsatisfactory actions before and during the attacks, the highly questionable subsequent actions by the Administration can only be addressed by first identifying who made, directed, and/or approved the massive changes to the original draft talking points. Then we can look for the reasons for the changes.
We've been shown copies of the draft talking points in their doctored forms. These talking points, made infamous by Ambassador Susan Rice, had the truth excised.
The answers we, the American public, need will tell us who -- specifically -- made, directed, and/or approved the massive changes to the talking points?
In addition to the abysmal and unsatisfactory actions before and during the attacks, the highly questionable subsequent actions by the Administration can only be addressed by first identifying who made, directed, and/or approved the massive changes to the original draft talking points. Then we can look for the reasons for the changes.
Find the (good natured) humor
Out and about yesterday, including mentoring at a charter school, I had occasion to encounter plenty of average folks. You know, the average Joes and Janes of our great nation. Some I know, others I don't. During our interactions, I looked for good-natured humor. Something, a quip, whatever that could produce a chuckle or smile.
For example, I stopped at a coffee shop, since there was 45 minutes available before I needed to arrive at the charter school. While ordering a cup of coffee, I saw and added to the order an all too tempting cinnamon roll. In response to the clerk's question if I wanted the roll heated, my response was, "No, I'll take it just the way it came off the tree." It took a moment, but she finally smiled and chuckled.
We all need to find good-natured humor. Enjoy and share a smile and chuckle. (In drafting this post, I have gone back to insert good-natured, because there seems to be way too much poor taste, personal slams, insults, sexual innuendo, harassment, and rudeness that some try to pass off as humor at the expense of the feelings of others these days.)
Certainly there is plenty to worry about, but why focus upon these things? Look for and find the good-natured humor. You'll feel better, it will improve your outlook on like, and others benefit as well.
The Marine friend about whom I've written in my posts is a great example. Whenever we are together, it's almost a contest to see who can find the most humor. Sure, we may take each other on, in a manner only available to close friends, but we never cross the line. As a result, we're constantly laughing, thoroughly enjoying our time together.
Over time I've watched how finding the good-natured humor in our everyday lives can make all the difference. For me, it it usually in the form of a quip, a spur of the moment or observation. One example happened in, of all places, a men's restroom in a fast food restaurant located adjacent to a major highway. We'd stopped, both to empty our bladders and get a bite to eat. Uncharacteristically, there was a line of men waiting to relieve themselves. (I know, women observe this is common in their restrooms. Trust me that it us very unusual for us guys.) Anyway, I joined the line. Several others filed in behind me, all of us silently awaiting our turns. Then a gent walked in, saw the line, and asked, "Are you all waiting to use the john?" Not able to resist the opening, I replied, "Nope, we all just decided to meet here today." Perhaps a wise-ass comment, it nonetheless produced a great guffaw from everyone. Humor, found in an unlikely spot.
I seem to recall that as youths we could find humor more easily than as adults. Assuredly there weren't socially necessary filters to much of the youthful humor, producing inappropriate or cruel actions serving as the sources. Nevertheless, our youth find it easier to find the humor in the everyday. Why do we, as adults, either fail to find the good-natured humor or suck it out of our daily lives? Why have scowls and frowns replaced grins and smiles? Why do we hear more curses that chuckles or laughs?
Undoubtedly there are many challenges, large and small, long and short term, crucial and minor facing us all. There are also times to be serious. But, in the average moments during an average day for the average Joe and Jane, there are also ample times to find the good-natured humor. All you need to do is look for it. Share that grin and chuckle.
For example, I stopped at a coffee shop, since there was 45 minutes available before I needed to arrive at the charter school. While ordering a cup of coffee, I saw and added to the order an all too tempting cinnamon roll. In response to the clerk's question if I wanted the roll heated, my response was, "No, I'll take it just the way it came off the tree." It took a moment, but she finally smiled and chuckled.
We all need to find good-natured humor. Enjoy and share a smile and chuckle. (In drafting this post, I have gone back to insert good-natured, because there seems to be way too much poor taste, personal slams, insults, sexual innuendo, harassment, and rudeness that some try to pass off as humor at the expense of the feelings of others these days.)
Certainly there is plenty to worry about, but why focus upon these things? Look for and find the good-natured humor. You'll feel better, it will improve your outlook on like, and others benefit as well.
The Marine friend about whom I've written in my posts is a great example. Whenever we are together, it's almost a contest to see who can find the most humor. Sure, we may take each other on, in a manner only available to close friends, but we never cross the line. As a result, we're constantly laughing, thoroughly enjoying our time together.
Over time I've watched how finding the good-natured humor in our everyday lives can make all the difference. For me, it it usually in the form of a quip, a spur of the moment or observation. One example happened in, of all places, a men's restroom in a fast food restaurant located adjacent to a major highway. We'd stopped, both to empty our bladders and get a bite to eat. Uncharacteristically, there was a line of men waiting to relieve themselves. (I know, women observe this is common in their restrooms. Trust me that it us very unusual for us guys.) Anyway, I joined the line. Several others filed in behind me, all of us silently awaiting our turns. Then a gent walked in, saw the line, and asked, "Are you all waiting to use the john?" Not able to resist the opening, I replied, "Nope, we all just decided to meet here today." Perhaps a wise-ass comment, it nonetheless produced a great guffaw from everyone. Humor, found in an unlikely spot.
I seem to recall that as youths we could find humor more easily than as adults. Assuredly there weren't socially necessary filters to much of the youthful humor, producing inappropriate or cruel actions serving as the sources. Nevertheless, our youth find it easier to find the humor in the everyday. Why do we, as adults, either fail to find the good-natured humor or suck it out of our daily lives? Why have scowls and frowns replaced grins and smiles? Why do we hear more curses that chuckles or laughs?
Undoubtedly there are many challenges, large and small, long and short term, crucial and minor facing us all. There are also times to be serious. But, in the average moments during an average day for the average Joe and Jane, there are also ample times to find the good-natured humor. All you need to do is look for it. Share that grin and chuckle.
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Extremism...at the center of it all
This morning, while enjoying the view over the first cup of coffee, I experienced an epiphany of sorts. (What is obvious to one is an epiphany to another.) Much, if not the majority, of that which is concerning has at its center the good being taken to the extreme. Sipping coffee, watching a band of light rain move from west to east, the clarity of this realization was crystalline. Musing over it more and more, other descriptors came to mind: the reasonable mutating into the unreasonable; rational sliding into the irrational; and so on. Then examples began coming to mind.
The first example coming to mind was organized labor. At its core, collective bargaining appears very reasonable to me. Having been a union member at times in my professional life, I saw its value. But as time went on, I began realizing the value had been replaced by the unreasonable: mandatory union membership and dues providing organized labor a guaranteed pool of money that lawmakers allow to be used for political purposes. (For example, the National Education Association adopted an anti-war plank at one of its national conventions. What, pray tell, does that have to do with collective bargaining for teachers?) In a form of taxation without representation, union leaders in countless sectors create political clout by the enforced donations to those disposed to labor's cause and funding anti-candidate messages for those not so inclined. This political power goes well beyond the initial objective of collective bargaining. In some states, such as California, it has resulted in guaranteed state constitutional protections for certain labor groups, such as teachers. Another current example involves correctional officers in Maryland, as described in a recent Washington Post online story by Charles Lane. “Keeping watch over often-violent offenders is a tough job that most correctional officers do honestly. They deserve a decent wage and fair treatment on the job. But neither they nor any other workers who serve the public deserve special influence over state government. That is what they get when their unions accumulate cash through mandatory dues checkoffs — from tax-funded payrolls — and spend it on campaign contributions and lobbying. One of the most powerful public-sector unions in the country is the California Correctional Peace Officers Association, which used its political might to secure not only expensive pensions and benefits but also passage of a “three strikes and you’re out” law — which created jobs for unionized correctional officers by swelling California’s prison population. Maryland’s correctional officers union is not nearly that powerful, but its officials are working on it. “From the beginning, AFSCME Maryland set an aggressive agenda,” the union’s Web site boasts. “Recognizing that state laws and political decisions controlled our work lives, AFSCME Maryland members embarked on a mission to develop political power through legislative action.”” “A Baltimore jail scandal aided by union politics,” Charles Lane, Washington Post online. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-lane-a-baltimore-jail-scandal-aided-by-union-politics/2013/05/06/d90bc90e-b67b-11e2-b94c-b684dda07add_story.html?hpid=z2
Please note the underlined sentences, as they describe consequence of this form of extremism: "...special influence over state government..." and "...mandatory dues...[spent] on campaign contributions and lobbying." Unreasonable actions by organized labor is just one example of extremism.
Another is the perverted interpretation of religion by progressive liberals. The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." It is clearly black letter law that I can freely practice my religion, Christianity. However, of recent, the progressive liberals (legislators, judges, media, pundits, school administrators, universities) have taken the Amendment to an extreme. Pushing, nay demanding, respect for non-Christian religions, they move to restrict the "free practice" of Christianity. Crosses can't be displayed, prayer groups can't be organized, Bibles can't be opened, Merry Christmas can't be uttered. The good of the First Amendment has been taken to an unreasonable extreme.
Of course, when speaking of extremism and Christianity, one must mention the Islamic extremists. Islam, as do all major religions, is peaceful in its premise. Unfortunately, in its name, three are those who wantonly kill, having taken the good messages and perverted them in the extreme to warrant unbelievable violence. The vast majority of the millions of Muslims are peace loving and seeking. Many, far too many, however seek destruction in the name of Islam. The good and positive of Islam has been taken captive by some advocating an extreme interpretation of Allah's words.
The next example is the current state of the civil rights movement. As a teenager in the 1960s, one of the most positively influential individuals was Martin Luther King, Jr. On August 28, 1963 he gave what most believe to be his most important speech. Following are a couple excerpts:
Finally, discussing extremism can't be complete without pointing to our federal government. Hardly an element doesn't suffer from extremism. Legislators spending in the extreme. Partisan politics in the extreme. Politics itself has migrated from positive debates from which compromises are created for the good of the people, to extreme excoriations from both sides of the aisle. The reasonable levying of taxes to pay the reasonable debts of the nation has been taken to an extreme by legislators doling out pork laden bills to curry voter favor in pursuit of re-election and personal power. The positive inclination by some to go to Washington to be part of a government helping its people has denigrated to an extreme example of personal avarice and power seeking.
Indeed, it is an all too sad day. Extremism, on far too many fronts, is the cause for what concerns us.
The first example coming to mind was organized labor. At its core, collective bargaining appears very reasonable to me. Having been a union member at times in my professional life, I saw its value. But as time went on, I began realizing the value had been replaced by the unreasonable: mandatory union membership and dues providing organized labor a guaranteed pool of money that lawmakers allow to be used for political purposes. (For example, the National Education Association adopted an anti-war plank at one of its national conventions. What, pray tell, does that have to do with collective bargaining for teachers?) In a form of taxation without representation, union leaders in countless sectors create political clout by the enforced donations to those disposed to labor's cause and funding anti-candidate messages for those not so inclined. This political power goes well beyond the initial objective of collective bargaining. In some states, such as California, it has resulted in guaranteed state constitutional protections for certain labor groups, such as teachers. Another current example involves correctional officers in Maryland, as described in a recent Washington Post online story by Charles Lane. “Keeping watch over often-violent offenders is a tough job that most correctional officers do honestly. They deserve a decent wage and fair treatment on the job. But neither they nor any other workers who serve the public deserve special influence over state government. That is what they get when their unions accumulate cash through mandatory dues checkoffs — from tax-funded payrolls — and spend it on campaign contributions and lobbying. One of the most powerful public-sector unions in the country is the California Correctional Peace Officers Association, which used its political might to secure not only expensive pensions and benefits but also passage of a “three strikes and you’re out” law — which created jobs for unionized correctional officers by swelling California’s prison population. Maryland’s correctional officers union is not nearly that powerful, but its officials are working on it. “From the beginning, AFSCME Maryland set an aggressive agenda,” the union’s Web site boasts. “Recognizing that state laws and political decisions controlled our work lives, AFSCME Maryland members embarked on a mission to develop political power through legislative action.”” “A Baltimore jail scandal aided by union politics,” Charles Lane, Washington Post online. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-lane-a-baltimore-jail-scandal-aided-by-union-politics/2013/05/06/d90bc90e-b67b-11e2-b94c-b684dda07add_story.html?hpid=z2
Please note the underlined sentences, as they describe consequence of this form of extremism: "...special influence over state government..." and "...mandatory dues...[spent] on campaign contributions and lobbying." Unreasonable actions by organized labor is just one example of extremism.
Another is the perverted interpretation of religion by progressive liberals. The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." It is clearly black letter law that I can freely practice my religion, Christianity. However, of recent, the progressive liberals (legislators, judges, media, pundits, school administrators, universities) have taken the Amendment to an extreme. Pushing, nay demanding, respect for non-Christian religions, they move to restrict the "free practice" of Christianity. Crosses can't be displayed, prayer groups can't be organized, Bibles can't be opened, Merry Christmas can't be uttered. The good of the First Amendment has been taken to an unreasonable extreme.
Of course, when speaking of extremism and Christianity, one must mention the Islamic extremists. Islam, as do all major religions, is peaceful in its premise. Unfortunately, in its name, three are those who wantonly kill, having taken the good messages and perverted them in the extreme to warrant unbelievable violence. The vast majority of the millions of Muslims are peace loving and seeking. Many, far too many, however seek destruction in the name of Islam. The good and positive of Islam has been taken captive by some advocating an extreme interpretation of Allah's words.
The next example is the current state of the civil rights movement. As a teenager in the 1960s, one of the most positively influential individuals was Martin Luther King, Jr. On August 28, 1963 he gave what most believe to be his most important speech. Following are a couple excerpts:
“Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force. The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone.”
“I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
Yet, nearly 50 years later, when employed as a white male on a major university campus, I was the recipient of extremism cloaked in the phrase of civil rights. I was told that, as a white man, I shouldn't hold a certain job on campus. We also read, hear, and see so-called ministers and civil rights leaders castigate all whites in an all too sad example of blatant racism. Essentially the same form of racism Dr. King marched to protest. Even in the administration of the President of the United States, people continue to look for extreme reasons to cry the false racist foul. These individuals bemoan their perceived lack of "diversity" in the President's Cabinet. These individuals aren't judging the character of the members of the Cabinet, but are judging the color (or gender) of its members. I firmly believe Dr. King would be appalled at the extremism resident in many parts of the country, from the highest elected levels to the lowest rungs on the economic ladder. The positive messages of fifty years ago have been hijacked by extremists into the unreasonable and the irrational.Finally, discussing extremism can't be complete without pointing to our federal government. Hardly an element doesn't suffer from extremism. Legislators spending in the extreme. Partisan politics in the extreme. Politics itself has migrated from positive debates from which compromises are created for the good of the people, to extreme excoriations from both sides of the aisle. The reasonable levying of taxes to pay the reasonable debts of the nation has been taken to an extreme by legislators doling out pork laden bills to curry voter favor in pursuit of re-election and personal power. The positive inclination by some to go to Washington to be part of a government helping its people has denigrated to an extreme example of personal avarice and power seeking.
Indeed, it is an all too sad day. Extremism, on far too many fronts, is the cause for what concerns us.
Friday, May 3, 2013
Straight talk
Propaganda and denunciation are not leadership traits. Likewise, unfounded assertions and assumptions unsupported by facts are not policy. Euphemisms instead of straight talk is not public discourse. And character assassination is not debate. Unfortunately, as the nation wrestles with enormous issues bearing on the average Joe and Jane, these are the tactics and practices of far too many, be they elected officials (both parties), educators, unions, lobbyists, main stream media, talk show hosts, entertainers, businesses, or pundits.
Of great concern to me is the manner in which various entities use these tactics and practices in their attempt to sway public opinion and thereby apply pressure to decision makers. Or, if a decision maker or in a position of authority, use the tactics and practices to obscure the truth or slant it to suit their own agenda. It seems that truth, honesty, accuracy, and facts have gone the way of the traditional American family unit, disappearing from the daily scene.
And the average Joe and Jane are expected to make sense of all the competing and conflicting barrage of pseudo-information that fills the airwaves, populates our smart phone, permeates cable TV, and explodes in the various print and on-line "so-called" news outlets.
Of course, those with the prominent platforms and lofty positions use their status to shovel out buckets full of propaganda. Propaganda is defined by Dictionary.com as "information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc." (Please note the absent of fact or truth in the definition.) Half-truths, non-truths, fabrications abound. The sky is falling, doom is imminent, crisis is at hand. Yet only those shoveling the propaganda claim to be able to resolve the matter. If, however, unable to resolve it to their self-defined satisfaction, the next tactic is to denounce anyone who disagrees. Just as the definition of propaganda refers to "harm," the same source defines denounce as "to condemn or censure openly or publicly." Sadly, when denouncing doesn't work, the tactics and practices further devolve to character assassination. Seeking to harm, condemn, and assassinate hardly seem appropriate for public debate. Certainly these are not the traits of leaders.
Yet, those who self-description includes leader have turned these tactics and practices into the norm, almost as if elevating them to acceptable behavior. However, the average Joe and Jane can't buy such tripe. After all, Joe and Jane are ultimately the beneficiaries or victims. They are then entitled to straight talk, accurate facts, candor without rancor, and substantiation.
The nation needs and deserves leadership, policy, public discourse, and debate.
Too bad we don't get it from the elected officials (both parties), educators, unions, lobbyists, main stream media, talk show hosts, entertainers, businesses, or pundits.
Of great concern to me is the manner in which various entities use these tactics and practices in their attempt to sway public opinion and thereby apply pressure to decision makers. Or, if a decision maker or in a position of authority, use the tactics and practices to obscure the truth or slant it to suit their own agenda. It seems that truth, honesty, accuracy, and facts have gone the way of the traditional American family unit, disappearing from the daily scene.
And the average Joe and Jane are expected to make sense of all the competing and conflicting barrage of pseudo-information that fills the airwaves, populates our smart phone, permeates cable TV, and explodes in the various print and on-line "so-called" news outlets.
Of course, those with the prominent platforms and lofty positions use their status to shovel out buckets full of propaganda. Propaganda is defined by Dictionary.com as "information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm a person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc." (Please note the absent of fact or truth in the definition.) Half-truths, non-truths, fabrications abound. The sky is falling, doom is imminent, crisis is at hand. Yet only those shoveling the propaganda claim to be able to resolve the matter. If, however, unable to resolve it to their self-defined satisfaction, the next tactic is to denounce anyone who disagrees. Just as the definition of propaganda refers to "harm," the same source defines denounce as "to condemn or censure openly or publicly." Sadly, when denouncing doesn't work, the tactics and practices further devolve to character assassination. Seeking to harm, condemn, and assassinate hardly seem appropriate for public debate. Certainly these are not the traits of leaders.
Yet, those who self-description includes leader have turned these tactics and practices into the norm, almost as if elevating them to acceptable behavior. However, the average Joe and Jane can't buy such tripe. After all, Joe and Jane are ultimately the beneficiaries or victims. They are then entitled to straight talk, accurate facts, candor without rancor, and substantiation.
The nation needs and deserves leadership, policy, public discourse, and debate.
Too bad we don't get it from the elected officials (both parties), educators, unions, lobbyists, main stream media, talk show hosts, entertainers, businesses, or pundits.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
The early morning
Perhaps due to decades as a Marine on active duty or to personal proclivity, I routinely arise early and head out for a morning run. This part of my fitness regime averages an hour of pounding the payment, as some call it. These early morning runs have begun as early as 0400 (4 AM in civilian time), though usually I am out the door between 0500-0530 daily. There is something special about the early morning, whether it is here in the town in which I live or somewhere when we are on the road for vacations. Getting up and out at what my motorcycling buddy and lifelong friend calls the butt-crack of dawn is invigorating. The invigoration comes from more than the physical exercise, which grows in importance as we age. The invigoration comes from experiencing the beginning of a new day. Thus, the early morning is very special.
Whether it is a brisk morning worthy of a watch cap and gloves or simply a cool morning in which a long sleeve t-shirt is adequate, there is something so very special about starting the day just before the sun comes up. As I continue along the regular route, there are familiar aspects. The one area where sprinklers are soaking the area, so I shift from the sidewalk to the street. The homeless gent, who takes refuge in the bus stop each night. The same cars going down the street heading to work. The occasional wave from a neighbor as he heads out to work. The one hard hill I have to run, getting the heart rate up. The greenery of the gardens. Being outside, pounding the pavement as it were, as the first rays of sun light pop up in the east, listening the birds beginning to call, hearing the occasional lawn sprinkler in the distance, watching my neighborhood come to life, and the smell of cooking bacon, all of these combine to provide an offer and expectation of good things to come.
With expectation hanging in the air, there seems to be an anticipatory silence. The noise hasn't risen to the mid-day level. It is as if the world is waiting to begin. We are in the starting blocks for today's race of the day. Just prior to the starter's gun going off to start the race, there is that moment of peaceful silence, all all await the beginning. And from these beginnings, great endings occur. The promise held by the day, even when most days are simply repeats of previous days. Whether employed, retired, unemployed, on vacation, in school, on a day off, or another status, each day holds forth opportunities. Some new, some residual.
It is the anticipation of these opportunities that make the early morning special. Who knows what may come our way? I eagerly look forward to the dawn of the new day, as it brings forth the possibility of new opportunities. Being out there on a early morning run enables me to physically partake of the dawn. By the time I have run the last hill, I'm ready for the day and whatever it may throw my way.
Dang, the early mornings are so very special.
Whether it is a brisk morning worthy of a watch cap and gloves or simply a cool morning in which a long sleeve t-shirt is adequate, there is something so very special about starting the day just before the sun comes up. As I continue along the regular route, there are familiar aspects. The one area where sprinklers are soaking the area, so I shift from the sidewalk to the street. The homeless gent, who takes refuge in the bus stop each night. The same cars going down the street heading to work. The occasional wave from a neighbor as he heads out to work. The one hard hill I have to run, getting the heart rate up. The greenery of the gardens. Being outside, pounding the pavement as it were, as the first rays of sun light pop up in the east, listening the birds beginning to call, hearing the occasional lawn sprinkler in the distance, watching my neighborhood come to life, and the smell of cooking bacon, all of these combine to provide an offer and expectation of good things to come.
With expectation hanging in the air, there seems to be an anticipatory silence. The noise hasn't risen to the mid-day level. It is as if the world is waiting to begin. We are in the starting blocks for today's race of the day. Just prior to the starter's gun going off to start the race, there is that moment of peaceful silence, all all await the beginning. And from these beginnings, great endings occur. The promise held by the day, even when most days are simply repeats of previous days. Whether employed, retired, unemployed, on vacation, in school, on a day off, or another status, each day holds forth opportunities. Some new, some residual.
It is the anticipation of these opportunities that make the early morning special. Who knows what may come our way? I eagerly look forward to the dawn of the new day, as it brings forth the possibility of new opportunities. Being out there on a early morning run enables me to physically partake of the dawn. By the time I have run the last hill, I'm ready for the day and whatever it may throw my way.
Dang, the early mornings are so very special.
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Media hypocrisy
I find it disturbing that the White House Correspondents Dinner (WHCD) garners seemingly unlimited media attention. A glitzy gathering for those on the "A" list, with jokes from POTUS and the designated host, the event is a staple for those working within the Beltway. Days of build up, with numerous stories meant to whet the appetite of the reader for more of the drivel most media pass on as information. Pre-parties, the red carpet arrivals, who brings whom to the event, the dress worn by the First Lady, and on and on.
Enough already.
The self-serving over reporting of an unimportant social event illustrates what media critics deplore: hypocrisy. (To the voices raised in objection, I'll stipulate the event does raise money for charity. However, this fundraising can easily be done without the cost and spectacle of the event itself.) The media is, sadly, hypocritical. Not long ago the White House Correspondents Association (WHCA) bemoaned the lack of access to the President, stating they are "shut out." But at the WHCD, everyone is all chummy. Obviously the WHCA wasn't shut out of the event. So it leaves me wondering at the spectacle and lack of principle by the WHCA. If, as a group, the WHCA truly believed they are being shut out by POTUS, then what better way to make a statement than not holding the annual event? Why give the electeds and their hangers on a glitzy affair at which they can rub elbows with entertainers? The hypocritical media simply can't see past itself to understand the contradiction between their words and actions.
Beyond that contradiction, another aspect of the excessively fawning coverage of the WHCD is troublesome. The self-same media isn't covering the trial of the abortionist Gosnell. (Reports describing the manner of his killing of children are gruesome and won't be repeated here.) Abortion remains an issue that sharply divides the country. As such, this trial then deserves complete coverage, because it is news. Those who "report" about the color of the dress the First Lady wore to the WHCD consider it to be news. Why not the Gosnell trial. There is a one word answer: hypocrisy.
So,when seeing the amount of (supposed) news converge of the WHCD, I'm saddened and angry. Saddened at the spectacle and angry at the hypocrisy.
Enough already.
The self-serving over reporting of an unimportant social event illustrates what media critics deplore: hypocrisy. (To the voices raised in objection, I'll stipulate the event does raise money for charity. However, this fundraising can easily be done without the cost and spectacle of the event itself.) The media is, sadly, hypocritical. Not long ago the White House Correspondents Association (WHCA) bemoaned the lack of access to the President, stating they are "shut out." But at the WHCD, everyone is all chummy. Obviously the WHCA wasn't shut out of the event. So it leaves me wondering at the spectacle and lack of principle by the WHCA. If, as a group, the WHCA truly believed they are being shut out by POTUS, then what better way to make a statement than not holding the annual event? Why give the electeds and their hangers on a glitzy affair at which they can rub elbows with entertainers? The hypocritical media simply can't see past itself to understand the contradiction between their words and actions.
Beyond that contradiction, another aspect of the excessively fawning coverage of the WHCD is troublesome. The self-same media isn't covering the trial of the abortionist Gosnell. (Reports describing the manner of his killing of children are gruesome and won't be repeated here.) Abortion remains an issue that sharply divides the country. As such, this trial then deserves complete coverage, because it is news. Those who "report" about the color of the dress the First Lady wore to the WHCD consider it to be news. Why not the Gosnell trial. There is a one word answer: hypocrisy.
So,when seeing the amount of (supposed) news converge of the WHCD, I'm saddened and angry. Saddened at the spectacle and angry at the hypocrisy.
Friday, April 26, 2013
Creating leaders
In what some may argue is an unfair comparison, since retiring from the military most individuals I've encountered in positions of leadership in the civilian sector are ill equipped (or ill suited) to the responsibilities inherent to such positions. Far too often I've seen someone who displayed technical/professional competence or having specific personal connections unwisely advanced to leadership positions, without benefit of training, education, or experience in the principles, responsibilities, traits, or requirements of leadership. Consequently, many, if not most, of these individuals are woefully deficient as leaders. Exacerbating the problem is that often these individuals first fill leadership positions at relatively high levels, at which their inevitable errors are dramatic and broad in impact.
At this point it is worth mentioning that individuals who fail as leaders, after being placed in these positions without the aforementioned training, education, or experience are not necessarily bad people. They happen to make horrible decisions, adversely impacting those they supposedly lead. I'd argue many of these mistakes are the result of the lack training, education,and experience. I'll provide a couple of examples to illustrate the observation.
Example #1. A nationwide non-profit hired on a relatively young individual, with no-to-minimal leadership experience to serve as the top officer. Over time, it became crystal clear he wasn't aware of basic tenants of leadership, particularly the value of human capital. Known for ranting and raving, he publicly belittled subordinates; castigated managers in email broadcast to the entire organization; refused suggestions for improvement; and sought to marginalize those who dared disagree with his views. The revolving door of the headquarters staff and perpetual reorganizations illustrate the impact of his leadership failure. Further, his communication skills were abysmal, as he rarely if ever communicated in substantive ways with the all-too-critical leaders at the chapters. (Note: communication is defined as meaningful exchanges between two or more individuals.) Instead, he isolated himself in an aloof and insular manner. Over time, he lost the trust and confidence of the organization. For one, I judge the fault for the circumstances to be equally divided between the individual and the board of directors that hired him. Leadership education, training, and experience matter. The absence of leadership skills manifested itself time and time again, demoralizing the organization. This young man was insufficiently prepared to assume the position and responsibility of a national organization.
Example #2. At a major public university, the director of one of the most important offices on campus was put into place by a senior administrator, who had previously served as the office's director. The new director was a technical whizz and could make systems that supported the office sing. However, she'd never been trained in leadership or held any position in which she'd learn it. Over time, this adversely impacted the office. However, though apparent to all, nothing was done because she had top cover from the individual who had elevated her to the office directorship. Over time, the university and others knew she was an failed leader, but could do nothing. Failing to lead by example from the front, she'd call meetings and then fail to attend. She failed to respond to calls and email from across the campus. She'd fail to recognize superlative efforts of her staff, yet was manic in pursuing a dress code. Once more, the absence of leadership training, education, and experience displayed itself in a woefully deficient leader. As an aside, after years without one, the university initiated a leadership training program. It was something, though lacking a core, central leadership ethos upon which a leadership philosophy could be built. In fact, the "key" speakers could actually be viewed as teaching the wrong lessons. One famously told a class that they shouldn't be concerned with regulations and policies.
These are just two examples of many I've noticed in the civilian sector.
Where some may not like the comparison, I'll nevertheless offer that the Marine Corps ethos includes the education and development of leaders. From day one, Marines are taught leadership and are expected to develop as leaders. The same leadership traits and principles apply for Privates as they do for Generals. In addition to the intense training, Marines are placed in positions of increasing responsibility, to take the leadership lessons and put them into practice. There is a good reason Second Lieutenants don't lead Marine Expeditionary Forces. Simply put, they haven't the experience. The young officers start with platoons and work their way up the rank structure, leading units of increasing size and complexity. Those who excel move up to command battalions, regiments, and divisions. They learn a comprehensive leadership ethos, complete with traits and principles. And they garner experience along the way. When an officer is selected to command a Marine Expeditionary Force, he has decades of training, education, and experience as a leader, unlike the man in example #1 and the lady in example #2,
Alluded to is another critical failing in the civilian sector: the absence of institutional leadership philosophy, traits, principles, expectations, etc. An organization must establish them and everyone in the organization must know these and be required to adhere to them. With such as approach, the institution/organization can develop leaders from within, allow them to grow and mature, thereby providing a pool of internal candidates for advancement. One obvious advantage of internal candidates is that it is positive for morale when employees know they can work hard to move up in the organization. Furthermore, ti provides for stability, rather than the constant state of flux experienced in many organizations, like the two sited in the examples.
So, when it comes down to it, leadership really isn't that challenging. The organization must establish, promulgate, and adhere to a leadership philosophy, then train and educate leaders, and finally provide them the experience to grow and become the higher level, senior leaders of tomorrow.
At this point it is worth mentioning that individuals who fail as leaders, after being placed in these positions without the aforementioned training, education, or experience are not necessarily bad people. They happen to make horrible decisions, adversely impacting those they supposedly lead. I'd argue many of these mistakes are the result of the lack training, education,and experience. I'll provide a couple of examples to illustrate the observation.
Example #1. A nationwide non-profit hired on a relatively young individual, with no-to-minimal leadership experience to serve as the top officer. Over time, it became crystal clear he wasn't aware of basic tenants of leadership, particularly the value of human capital. Known for ranting and raving, he publicly belittled subordinates; castigated managers in email broadcast to the entire organization; refused suggestions for improvement; and sought to marginalize those who dared disagree with his views. The revolving door of the headquarters staff and perpetual reorganizations illustrate the impact of his leadership failure. Further, his communication skills were abysmal, as he rarely if ever communicated in substantive ways with the all-too-critical leaders at the chapters. (Note: communication is defined as meaningful exchanges between two or more individuals.) Instead, he isolated himself in an aloof and insular manner. Over time, he lost the trust and confidence of the organization. For one, I judge the fault for the circumstances to be equally divided between the individual and the board of directors that hired him. Leadership education, training, and experience matter. The absence of leadership skills manifested itself time and time again, demoralizing the organization. This young man was insufficiently prepared to assume the position and responsibility of a national organization.
Example #2. At a major public university, the director of one of the most important offices on campus was put into place by a senior administrator, who had previously served as the office's director. The new director was a technical whizz and could make systems that supported the office sing. However, she'd never been trained in leadership or held any position in which she'd learn it. Over time, this adversely impacted the office. However, though apparent to all, nothing was done because she had top cover from the individual who had elevated her to the office directorship. Over time, the university and others knew she was an failed leader, but could do nothing. Failing to lead by example from the front, she'd call meetings and then fail to attend. She failed to respond to calls and email from across the campus. She'd fail to recognize superlative efforts of her staff, yet was manic in pursuing a dress code. Once more, the absence of leadership training, education, and experience displayed itself in a woefully deficient leader. As an aside, after years without one, the university initiated a leadership training program. It was something, though lacking a core, central leadership ethos upon which a leadership philosophy could be built. In fact, the "key" speakers could actually be viewed as teaching the wrong lessons. One famously told a class that they shouldn't be concerned with regulations and policies.
These are just two examples of many I've noticed in the civilian sector.
Where some may not like the comparison, I'll nevertheless offer that the Marine Corps ethos includes the education and development of leaders. From day one, Marines are taught leadership and are expected to develop as leaders. The same leadership traits and principles apply for Privates as they do for Generals. In addition to the intense training, Marines are placed in positions of increasing responsibility, to take the leadership lessons and put them into practice. There is a good reason Second Lieutenants don't lead Marine Expeditionary Forces. Simply put, they haven't the experience. The young officers start with platoons and work their way up the rank structure, leading units of increasing size and complexity. Those who excel move up to command battalions, regiments, and divisions. They learn a comprehensive leadership ethos, complete with traits and principles. And they garner experience along the way. When an officer is selected to command a Marine Expeditionary Force, he has decades of training, education, and experience as a leader, unlike the man in example #1 and the lady in example #2,
Alluded to is another critical failing in the civilian sector: the absence of institutional leadership philosophy, traits, principles, expectations, etc. An organization must establish them and everyone in the organization must know these and be required to adhere to them. With such as approach, the institution/organization can develop leaders from within, allow them to grow and mature, thereby providing a pool of internal candidates for advancement. One obvious advantage of internal candidates is that it is positive for morale when employees know they can work hard to move up in the organization. Furthermore, ti provides for stability, rather than the constant state of flux experienced in many organizations, like the two sited in the examples.
So, when it comes down to it, leadership really isn't that challenging. The organization must establish, promulgate, and adhere to a leadership philosophy, then train and educate leaders, and finally provide them the experience to grow and become the higher level, senior leaders of tomorrow.
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
People - the best in our lives
What is best in our lives?
It certainly are not the things we accumulate, use, and dispose of with amazing regularity. (Thank you to the consumer driven advertising prevalent across the nation.) Can it be the accomplishments of a career? Hard to say, because the definition of career has changed so dramatically over the past few decades, with it now being rare for one to remain with one company or even in one occupation for a lifetime. Education? Hardly, because if we are to believe the numbers put forth by some, the high school drop out rate is astoundingly high. Is it where we reside? Possibly, because there is so much beauty in so many regions of the country, though I find it hard to declare beauty in the noise and congestion of the urban valleys of New York City. Music? Can't dispute that music is singularly evocative, with such a rich variety that appeals to folks world wide. Sports? Here we must delineate between participant and spectator. Still, there are countless sports in which interest is held.
After serious reflection over the morning's first cup of coffee, what is best in our lives aren't material possessions; aren't the accomplishments of a career; isn't education; isn't where we live; and even isn't music or sports.
What is best in our lives are the people with whom we share it.
Beginning with family, extending to friends, expanding to co-workers, and rounding out with those with whom we come into contact, once or occasionally, people are what make our lives and give them meaning. People provide the exceptionally positive, generate the smiles, create the cause for laughter, and provide the context within which these emotions exist. People also provide the basis for the emotional pain that is also part of life. The first broken heart. The social overture rejected. Assumed friendship betrayed. Jilted lovers. Divorce. Horrible boss. Annoying neighbor. Rude individuals. Death of a spouse. As with the positive, people are the sources of the most emotional negatives in our loves as well.
Thankfully, for the majority of us, people provide for far more happiness than pain and aggravation.
So, as we maneuver our way through life, whatever the path we choose, whatever turn we take (expectedly or unintentionally), relish the human part of the experience. Find the opening for the positive, even if it is only to express thank-you or to share a smile. Whether naturally extroverted or introverted, redneck or urban dweller, young or old, athletic participant or spectator, manager or employee, I urge that you value the human interaction, seek the good in it, accept that pain may come, but always look for the positive.
It is in that positive that you will find the best in your life.
It certainly are not the things we accumulate, use, and dispose of with amazing regularity. (Thank you to the consumer driven advertising prevalent across the nation.) Can it be the accomplishments of a career? Hard to say, because the definition of career has changed so dramatically over the past few decades, with it now being rare for one to remain with one company or even in one occupation for a lifetime. Education? Hardly, because if we are to believe the numbers put forth by some, the high school drop out rate is astoundingly high. Is it where we reside? Possibly, because there is so much beauty in so many regions of the country, though I find it hard to declare beauty in the noise and congestion of the urban valleys of New York City. Music? Can't dispute that music is singularly evocative, with such a rich variety that appeals to folks world wide. Sports? Here we must delineate between participant and spectator. Still, there are countless sports in which interest is held.
After serious reflection over the morning's first cup of coffee, what is best in our lives aren't material possessions; aren't the accomplishments of a career; isn't education; isn't where we live; and even isn't music or sports.
What is best in our lives are the people with whom we share it.
Beginning with family, extending to friends, expanding to co-workers, and rounding out with those with whom we come into contact, once or occasionally, people are what make our lives and give them meaning. People provide the exceptionally positive, generate the smiles, create the cause for laughter, and provide the context within which these emotions exist. People also provide the basis for the emotional pain that is also part of life. The first broken heart. The social overture rejected. Assumed friendship betrayed. Jilted lovers. Divorce. Horrible boss. Annoying neighbor. Rude individuals. Death of a spouse. As with the positive, people are the sources of the most emotional negatives in our loves as well.
Thankfully, for the majority of us, people provide for far more happiness than pain and aggravation.
So, as we maneuver our way through life, whatever the path we choose, whatever turn we take (expectedly or unintentionally), relish the human part of the experience. Find the opening for the positive, even if it is only to express thank-you or to share a smile. Whether naturally extroverted or introverted, redneck or urban dweller, young or old, athletic participant or spectator, manager or employee, I urge that you value the human interaction, seek the good in it, accept that pain may come, but always look for the positive.
It is in that positive that you will find the best in your life.
Saturday, April 20, 2013
Saying "thanks"
When is the last time you made the effort to recognize the good work of someone else? If you haven't, you should.
We are having some work done at the house, by a family owned contracting business. Yesterday, as I have done every day, I stepped out to ask them how everything was going. Steve, the owner's son who is leading the crew, said all was on track. I took a moment to thank him for the good work he and the crew were doing. In making the comment, it wan't simply gratuitous. It was sincere. It wasn't simply "keep up the good work," it was a personalized statement, citing a specific example of their good work. He stopped, turned, smiled, and thanked me. The whole exchange didn't take but a minute or so.
I hear all too often stories from folks who report having "fired someone up," because they had made a mistake or not delivered good service, the right product, or whatever. But I seldom hear examples about having told someone they did a good job, let alone went above and beyond. By the way, most often I hear about or see folks publicly berating someone, but rarely offering praise. Early in my training as a Marine, I learned "praise in public, criticize in private."
Certainly, as some might respond, there is a valid expectation of good service. Isn't that what is being paid for, after all? Can't really argue with the premise, but if it is offered as justification for not recognizing someone's good work, then the reader is missing the point. The point is to acknowledge when someone has done a good job.
It doesn't take a lot of time. It shouldn't be insincere. It can make both you and the person you recognize feel good. I like bringing a smile to someone's face.
As we rush through our worlds, the tendency is to become insular, interacting as little as possible with others. The advent of email, cell-phones, texting, Tweeting, and the like feeds this tendency. Our cars have also become havens, into which we retreat at the end of the work day, to drive home as quickly as traffic enables, then pull into our garages, only to close the door behind us. It reminds me of one neighborhood in which we lived in southern California, in which exactly that scenario was repeated week end, week out. There were neighbors on the street I'd literally never seen. I knew which cars went into which garages, but had no idea about the people driving them. Where we currently live, I know and speak with the neighbors. Many a Saturday morning has been spent shooting the bull with the guy across the street, standing in his drive way or ours.
What does this have to do with saying "thanks?" I see it as another example of the lessening of human interaction that our society actually pursues. rather than one-on-one, meaningful conversations, we're expected to pump out 140 character long Tweets or plop down words for all to read via Facebook. It's no wonder people do not take the time to say "thanks." Meaningful communication is rapidly disappearing. It is going the way of cursive handwriting, eloquent speech, articulate expression, and language skills.
I, for one, will continue to say "thanks" when the situation warrants it.
We are having some work done at the house, by a family owned contracting business. Yesterday, as I have done every day, I stepped out to ask them how everything was going. Steve, the owner's son who is leading the crew, said all was on track. I took a moment to thank him for the good work he and the crew were doing. In making the comment, it wan't simply gratuitous. It was sincere. It wasn't simply "keep up the good work," it was a personalized statement, citing a specific example of their good work. He stopped, turned, smiled, and thanked me. The whole exchange didn't take but a minute or so.
I hear all too often stories from folks who report having "fired someone up," because they had made a mistake or not delivered good service, the right product, or whatever. But I seldom hear examples about having told someone they did a good job, let alone went above and beyond. By the way, most often I hear about or see folks publicly berating someone, but rarely offering praise. Early in my training as a Marine, I learned "praise in public, criticize in private."
Certainly, as some might respond, there is a valid expectation of good service. Isn't that what is being paid for, after all? Can't really argue with the premise, but if it is offered as justification for not recognizing someone's good work, then the reader is missing the point. The point is to acknowledge when someone has done a good job.
It doesn't take a lot of time. It shouldn't be insincere. It can make both you and the person you recognize feel good. I like bringing a smile to someone's face.
As we rush through our worlds, the tendency is to become insular, interacting as little as possible with others. The advent of email, cell-phones, texting, Tweeting, and the like feeds this tendency. Our cars have also become havens, into which we retreat at the end of the work day, to drive home as quickly as traffic enables, then pull into our garages, only to close the door behind us. It reminds me of one neighborhood in which we lived in southern California, in which exactly that scenario was repeated week end, week out. There were neighbors on the street I'd literally never seen. I knew which cars went into which garages, but had no idea about the people driving them. Where we currently live, I know and speak with the neighbors. Many a Saturday morning has been spent shooting the bull with the guy across the street, standing in his drive way or ours.
What does this have to do with saying "thanks?" I see it as another example of the lessening of human interaction that our society actually pursues. rather than one-on-one, meaningful conversations, we're expected to pump out 140 character long Tweets or plop down words for all to read via Facebook. It's no wonder people do not take the time to say "thanks." Meaningful communication is rapidly disappearing. It is going the way of cursive handwriting, eloquent speech, articulate expression, and language skills.
I, for one, will continue to say "thanks" when the situation warrants it.
Friday, April 19, 2013
Again, violence grabs the nation's attention
The bombings during he Boston Marathon, plus the hunt for the perpetrators, grabs the nation's headlines and attention. Again, violence our attention.
Sitting safely, it is easy to throw out comments. So I will.
Too many of the progressive liberals forget, or do not want to acknowledge, that there is evil in the world. That evil all too often manifests itself in violent, horrible ways. Whether the shooter at Virgina Tech, the mentally deranged kill in Newtown, the jihadists at World Trade Center, or the local killer, rapist, or child abuser. There is evil in the world and all the platitudes by POTUS and the progressive liberals will not change that fact.
Legislators and pundits cannot stop evil, only determined men and women, willing to lay down their lives, are able to combat evil. The police in Boston, the Marines in Fallujah, the soldiers in Bagdag, the SEALS in Afghanistan, or the police across the nation. These are the men and women who tackle evil. All the politicians and pundits, stacked together, can't compare to a single iota of the men and women of law enforcement and the the Armed Forces, who stand ready, every single day, to lay in on the line.
AS the nation comes to grips with this latest assault, I hope and encourage fellow citizens to remember that evil doesn't play by the rules. Evil doesn't care about the progressive liberals whining views of the world. Evil is willing to take your life, the life of your wife, the lives of your children, the lives of your neighbors. The lives of people you've never met.
All the feel good rhetoric means nothing to those who are evil. Only force and the willingness to use it can counter it.
Thank God for our police and Armed Forces.
As violence again grabs the nation's attention, we have protectors willing to stand between us and those who would do evil.
Sitting safely, it is easy to throw out comments. So I will.
Too many of the progressive liberals forget, or do not want to acknowledge, that there is evil in the world. That evil all too often manifests itself in violent, horrible ways. Whether the shooter at Virgina Tech, the mentally deranged kill in Newtown, the jihadists at World Trade Center, or the local killer, rapist, or child abuser. There is evil in the world and all the platitudes by POTUS and the progressive liberals will not change that fact.
Legislators and pundits cannot stop evil, only determined men and women, willing to lay down their lives, are able to combat evil. The police in Boston, the Marines in Fallujah, the soldiers in Bagdag, the SEALS in Afghanistan, or the police across the nation. These are the men and women who tackle evil. All the politicians and pundits, stacked together, can't compare to a single iota of the men and women of law enforcement and the the Armed Forces, who stand ready, every single day, to lay in on the line.
AS the nation comes to grips with this latest assault, I hope and encourage fellow citizens to remember that evil doesn't play by the rules. Evil doesn't care about the progressive liberals whining views of the world. Evil is willing to take your life, the life of your wife, the lives of your children, the lives of your neighbors. The lives of people you've never met.
All the feel good rhetoric means nothing to those who are evil. Only force and the willingness to use it can counter it.
Thank God for our police and Armed Forces.
As violence again grabs the nation's attention, we have protectors willing to stand between us and those who would do evil.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
More on education
A while back I wrote about the so-called educator who cancelled celebrating high academic achievement at his middle school, because the students who tried for good grades and did not get them would be "devastated." As reported, "A Massachusetts principal has been criticized for canceling his school's Honors Night, saying it could be 'devastating' to the students who worked hard, but fell short of the grades."
Now we learn about rampant grade inflation in universities. https://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/articles/344660/higher-education-revalued
In the article, the author writes, "A half-century of grade inflation has been demonstrated repeatedly by national studies. Today, an A is the most common grade given in college — 43 percent of all grades, as opposed to 15 percent in the 1960s, according to Stuart Rojstaczer, formerly of Duke, and Christopher Healy, of Furman, who conducted a 50-year survey of grading. Arthur Levine, president of the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, has also studied the trajectory of college grades. He finds that in 1969, 7 percent of two- and four-year college students said their GPA was an A-minus or higher; by 2009, 41 percent of students did."
Adding the two reports together provides for an alarming sum. Recognizing achievement is yielding to rewarding attempts. Wanting is replacing attaining.
If these two stories characterize the state of education in our country, we are in very serious straits indeed. Our children spend more waking hours being influenced by teachers than they do by their parents. At the most formative times in their lives, they are exposed to subtle but dramatic influences. If education wants to make everyone feel good by lowering the standards, the natural, instinctive competitiveness we are born with is dampened. Through the years of exposure to this approach, in school and on the sports fields and courts around the country, our children and grand children are being taught the wrong lessons for life.
I fear that recent college graduate, who is one of the 43% to receive grades of A, departs schooling believing he/she is exceptional, as the grades received should convey. However, it is possible he/she is merely average. When the average individual faces the real world, competing with those who have proven themselves to actually be exceptional by their work, it won't be a pretty picture. Self-esteem crumbles. Work productivity, assuming they can secure a employment, suffers and they risk lost of the job. So begins a downwards spiral. They have been rewarded for merely wanting to achieve, not attaining. Attempts have been recognized, rather than achievement. Hell, I WANT to play professional baseball, but at 62 years of age, that isn't going to happen. Shouldn't a major league team give me a lucrative contract, simply because I want it? When failing to hit a 98 MPH fastball, shouldn't I be rewarded with a "he tried his best" bonus? Of course not. In the real world, achievement counts. Certainly we look for effort on behalf of our employees, but ultimately established goals must be attained. More over, some in the work force are average, some below average, some superior, some above average. But no way are 43% superior.
By the way, there is nothing wrong with being average. At the ceremony marking my retirement from the Marine Corps, I stated I made only one claim, that I was an average Marine. I met all the standards and requirements placed before me, excelling in a few. Average men and women built this country and made it great. Average men won the wars in which we fought. Average men and women share common values of hard work and ethics. The "average Joe (or Jane)," as the saying goes, is the most important individual in the country.
So, as I sit, sipping a morning cup of coffee, I'm angry at the progressive liberals in education. They are, from the cited stories, teaching the wrong lessons and encouraging the wrong behavior. It is time to shake up public education and inject some conservative values. Over a couple of generations, the hippies of the 60s have become the college presidents, senior teachers, professors, and those who control the teaching and training of the future generations of teachers. Like many, I believe public education is severely flawed and requires the average Joe and Jane to demand it be fixed.
Now we learn about rampant grade inflation in universities. https://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/articles/344660/higher-education-revalued
In the article, the author writes, "A half-century of grade inflation has been demonstrated repeatedly by national studies. Today, an A is the most common grade given in college — 43 percent of all grades, as opposed to 15 percent in the 1960s, according to Stuart Rojstaczer, formerly of Duke, and Christopher Healy, of Furman, who conducted a 50-year survey of grading. Arthur Levine, president of the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, has also studied the trajectory of college grades. He finds that in 1969, 7 percent of two- and four-year college students said their GPA was an A-minus or higher; by 2009, 41 percent of students did."
Adding the two reports together provides for an alarming sum. Recognizing achievement is yielding to rewarding attempts. Wanting is replacing attaining.
If these two stories characterize the state of education in our country, we are in very serious straits indeed. Our children spend more waking hours being influenced by teachers than they do by their parents. At the most formative times in their lives, they are exposed to subtle but dramatic influences. If education wants to make everyone feel good by lowering the standards, the natural, instinctive competitiveness we are born with is dampened. Through the years of exposure to this approach, in school and on the sports fields and courts around the country, our children and grand children are being taught the wrong lessons for life.
I fear that recent college graduate, who is one of the 43% to receive grades of A, departs schooling believing he/she is exceptional, as the grades received should convey. However, it is possible he/she is merely average. When the average individual faces the real world, competing with those who have proven themselves to actually be exceptional by their work, it won't be a pretty picture. Self-esteem crumbles. Work productivity, assuming they can secure a employment, suffers and they risk lost of the job. So begins a downwards spiral. They have been rewarded for merely wanting to achieve, not attaining. Attempts have been recognized, rather than achievement. Hell, I WANT to play professional baseball, but at 62 years of age, that isn't going to happen. Shouldn't a major league team give me a lucrative contract, simply because I want it? When failing to hit a 98 MPH fastball, shouldn't I be rewarded with a "he tried his best" bonus? Of course not. In the real world, achievement counts. Certainly we look for effort on behalf of our employees, but ultimately established goals must be attained. More over, some in the work force are average, some below average, some superior, some above average. But no way are 43% superior.
By the way, there is nothing wrong with being average. At the ceremony marking my retirement from the Marine Corps, I stated I made only one claim, that I was an average Marine. I met all the standards and requirements placed before me, excelling in a few. Average men and women built this country and made it great. Average men won the wars in which we fought. Average men and women share common values of hard work and ethics. The "average Joe (or Jane)," as the saying goes, is the most important individual in the country.
So, as I sit, sipping a morning cup of coffee, I'm angry at the progressive liberals in education. They are, from the cited stories, teaching the wrong lessons and encouraging the wrong behavior. It is time to shake up public education and inject some conservative values. Over a couple of generations, the hippies of the 60s have become the college presidents, senior teachers, professors, and those who control the teaching and training of the future generations of teachers. Like many, I believe public education is severely flawed and requires the average Joe and Jane to demand it be fixed.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Nothing like a truck
There is really nothing like a pick up truck. A new pick up truck brought out the guys in the neighborhood.
You might have guessed it, but we got a new pick-up truck yesterday. This morning, as I was trying to get my cell phone to synch with the truck's system, neighbors (all male) walked up and we started talking. "Great looking truck." "Can it tow?" "What's the mileage?" "Did you get a good deal?" Spring boarding from these questions, we talked about all manner of things male.
There's nothing like a truck.
The testosterone was flowing in earnest.
Sports, off-roading, politics, fishing, sports (again), etc. Guy talk. It was like a magnet had drawn us together to bond in the quintessentially male way. If a cave had been nearby, we surely would have started a fire, squatted down, cooked something over an open spit, and broke out a beer or two. Well, maybe not the beer at 0730. Perhaps a tall mug of coffee. But you get the idea.
There's nothing like a truck.
I can't think of any other American symbol so iconic to the male sector of society and history. A truck brings to mind images of cowboys, farmers, and ranchers. Male characters all. When on active duty in the Marine Corps, more of my young Marines owned pick-up trucks than any other type of vehicle. Even in this semi-suburban area in which we live, in southern California no less, the image the pick-up creates is overwhelmingly male. Dang. I even remarked that I feel far more manly after selling my sports car and getting the truck. Riding along, listening to country music, my red neck roots showing. Hard working. Levi blue jeans and a ball cap. Dedicated to family, faith, and country. The American flag. A Marine Corps decal in the back window.
There's nothing like a truck.
A lot of country music songs are either about or include reference to the pick-up truck. Even many of those written and sung by female artists.
There's nothing like a truck.
So, as I wash and wax the truck, I'll revel in it's unique place in American history and society. It's place is iconic, representing values and beliefs I hold as crucial. In a way, having a truck makes a statement I enjoy communicating to those around me.
(Foot note: I got a Ford truck, in large part because Ford Motor Company didn't take money from the Federal government, as did Chevrolet and Chrysler (maker of Dode Ram pick-up). GM stock went down and Chrysler didn't pay back all of the "loan." Ford business is booming, their products are more than competitive, and its decisions are supportable.)
You might have guessed it, but we got a new pick-up truck yesterday. This morning, as I was trying to get my cell phone to synch with the truck's system, neighbors (all male) walked up and we started talking. "Great looking truck." "Can it tow?" "What's the mileage?" "Did you get a good deal?" Spring boarding from these questions, we talked about all manner of things male.
There's nothing like a truck.
The testosterone was flowing in earnest.
Sports, off-roading, politics, fishing, sports (again), etc. Guy talk. It was like a magnet had drawn us together to bond in the quintessentially male way. If a cave had been nearby, we surely would have started a fire, squatted down, cooked something over an open spit, and broke out a beer or two. Well, maybe not the beer at 0730. Perhaps a tall mug of coffee. But you get the idea.
There's nothing like a truck.
I can't think of any other American symbol so iconic to the male sector of society and history. A truck brings to mind images of cowboys, farmers, and ranchers. Male characters all. When on active duty in the Marine Corps, more of my young Marines owned pick-up trucks than any other type of vehicle. Even in this semi-suburban area in which we live, in southern California no less, the image the pick-up creates is overwhelmingly male. Dang. I even remarked that I feel far more manly after selling my sports car and getting the truck. Riding along, listening to country music, my red neck roots showing. Hard working. Levi blue jeans and a ball cap. Dedicated to family, faith, and country. The American flag. A Marine Corps decal in the back window.
There's nothing like a truck.
A lot of country music songs are either about or include reference to the pick-up truck. Even many of those written and sung by female artists.
There's nothing like a truck.
So, as I wash and wax the truck, I'll revel in it's unique place in American history and society. It's place is iconic, representing values and beliefs I hold as crucial. In a way, having a truck makes a statement I enjoy communicating to those around me.
(Foot note: I got a Ford truck, in large part because Ford Motor Company didn't take money from the Federal government, as did Chevrolet and Chrysler (maker of Dode Ram pick-up). GM stock went down and Chrysler didn't pay back all of the "loan." Ford business is booming, their products are more than competitive, and its decisions are supportable.)
What's truly important
Were we to believe those who have the loudest and most comprehensive (at least as measured by the numbers of people they can reach) public megaphones, all sorts of things are terribly important. From the left and right sides of the political spectrum, the fringe groups aligned with either or neither, the honest and dishonest, the analytical and asinine, the believers and non-believers, the young and the old, the wealthy and the poor, the elected officials and unelectable, the whites and the blacks, the politically astute and politically corrupt, male and female, and all other manner of groupings, we are bombarded with innumerable, impassioned declarations about what is absolutely critical and important. That which we must, we are told and urged to hold above all else, accept as critically important as they would have us believe.
Why? Can't we, as free thinking individuals, agree on what is truly important? Do we really need someone to tell us what is important? Some don't actually tell, which conveys informing, but rather demand that we accept their definitions.
I offer that "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is a darn good place to start. Life: a healthy body free of injury and illness is important. By extension, the importance it extends to our loved ones. Liberty: the freedom to do as we choose, without intrusive government or other limitations. The ability to chart the paths our lives will take, according to our beliefs, values, abilities, and desires. As long as we don't infringe on others. Liberty within a nation and society that celebrate the individual, while providing reasonable support for the common good. Pursuit of happiness: seek out that which make us happy. Not happy as someone else would dictate, but happy as we define it. For example, I like to be with my family and friends, hold my wife, run, play tennis, ride a Harley, read, play with my grandchildren, reap the benefits of my own hard work, write, listen to country music, and wear Levi jeans and a ball cap. I also respect the rights of others to pursue what makes them happy.
My pursuit of happiness doesn't infringe on those who don't care for any of the activities listed above. Similarly, their pursuit of happiness shouldn't infringe upon me. I don't want to hear their hip hop/rap music booming from their cars in my neighborhood, just as I'm sure they don't want to hear the Zac Brown Band playing in theirs. I don't want or need a government to dictate a definition of happiness, anymore than it should allow others to reap the benefits of my hard work.
I don't need someone trying to dictate personal values and beliefs. Having stated this, I do, however, believe there are shared societal values and beliefs in the American culture. Some are readily apparent to the overwhelming majority of us. For example, raising, protecting, and nurturing our children. (In spite of MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry's bizzare statement that "part of it is that we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families and recognize that kids belong to whole communities.") It is true that many of the societal values and beliefs are under an all out assault by the liberal progressives. That assault, however, doesn't mean the values and beliefs are any less real today than they were years ago. The only real phenomenon is that the communications media has changed dramatically over the years, allowing those with the most comprehensive public megaphones to spread, broadcast, and insert their messages over wide sections of the populace.
For example, though the people of California overwhelmingly rejected gay marriage (Proposition 8), the progressive liberals have the use of comprehensive public megaphones to intone that it is a civil right. They seek to force values and beliefs on the majority of the remainder of the nation. All the loud noise they create doesn't change the fact that overwhelming majority of voters reject it.
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. All within the bounds of societal values and beliefs, most of which are codified in our Constitutional rights and other laws. (By the way, I'm compelled to cite that no where in the Constitution does it state separation of church and state. No where in the Constitution does it say I can't worship as a Christian. No where in the Constitution does it state homosexuals can marry.)
Regardless, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (not the expense of or infringing upon others) are what is truly important.
Why? Can't we, as free thinking individuals, agree on what is truly important? Do we really need someone to tell us what is important? Some don't actually tell, which conveys informing, but rather demand that we accept their definitions.
I offer that "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is a darn good place to start. Life: a healthy body free of injury and illness is important. By extension, the importance it extends to our loved ones. Liberty: the freedom to do as we choose, without intrusive government or other limitations. The ability to chart the paths our lives will take, according to our beliefs, values, abilities, and desires. As long as we don't infringe on others. Liberty within a nation and society that celebrate the individual, while providing reasonable support for the common good. Pursuit of happiness: seek out that which make us happy. Not happy as someone else would dictate, but happy as we define it. For example, I like to be with my family and friends, hold my wife, run, play tennis, ride a Harley, read, play with my grandchildren, reap the benefits of my own hard work, write, listen to country music, and wear Levi jeans and a ball cap. I also respect the rights of others to pursue what makes them happy.
My pursuit of happiness doesn't infringe on those who don't care for any of the activities listed above. Similarly, their pursuit of happiness shouldn't infringe upon me. I don't want to hear their hip hop/rap music booming from their cars in my neighborhood, just as I'm sure they don't want to hear the Zac Brown Band playing in theirs. I don't want or need a government to dictate a definition of happiness, anymore than it should allow others to reap the benefits of my hard work.
I don't need someone trying to dictate personal values and beliefs. Having stated this, I do, however, believe there are shared societal values and beliefs in the American culture. Some are readily apparent to the overwhelming majority of us. For example, raising, protecting, and nurturing our children. (In spite of MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry's bizzare statement that "part of it is that we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families and recognize that kids belong to whole communities.") It is true that many of the societal values and beliefs are under an all out assault by the liberal progressives. That assault, however, doesn't mean the values and beliefs are any less real today than they were years ago. The only real phenomenon is that the communications media has changed dramatically over the years, allowing those with the most comprehensive public megaphones to spread, broadcast, and insert their messages over wide sections of the populace.
For example, though the people of California overwhelmingly rejected gay marriage (Proposition 8), the progressive liberals have the use of comprehensive public megaphones to intone that it is a civil right. They seek to force values and beliefs on the majority of the remainder of the nation. All the loud noise they create doesn't change the fact that overwhelming majority of voters reject it.
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. All within the bounds of societal values and beliefs, most of which are codified in our Constitutional rights and other laws. (By the way, I'm compelled to cite that no where in the Constitution does it state separation of church and state. No where in the Constitution does it say I can't worship as a Christian. No where in the Constitution does it state homosexuals can marry.)
Regardless, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (not the expense of or infringing upon others) are what is truly important.
Monday, April 8, 2013
America needs a Margaret Thatcher
The world is a better place for having experienced England's Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
We in America desperately need a Margaret Thatcher. We need a strong leader like her, because our problems require a person of character to resolve them.
When she was elected Prime Minister, we'd been living in England for two years. The grip "labour" (organized labor AKA unions) had on the country was horrible, as illustrated by the mass transit and other strikes. Socialist policies did not encourage young men and women to seek either education or employment. In fact, it actually encouraged them to go on the dole. The giveaways were astounding. Government funded housing, called council housing, proliferated and were the petri dishes in which violence, sloth, and football (soccer) hooliganism bred. It was not a pleasant time to be in England. Then she was elected Prime Minister.
As George Will notes, "When she left office in 1990, the trade unions had been tamed by democratizing them, the political argument was about how to achieve economic growth rather than redistribute wealth, and individualism and nationalism were revitalized."
Does his description of Thatcher's achievements sound appealing? Certainly does to me. Most likely because the same type of issues are upon us.
Somewhere in our great nation, there must be a Margaret Thatcher who can rise to lead the nation back to its greatness and away from the socialist agenda of the current progressive liberals.
We in America desperately need a Margaret Thatcher. We need a strong leader like her, because our problems require a person of character to resolve them.
When she was elected Prime Minister, we'd been living in England for two years. The grip "labour" (organized labor AKA unions) had on the country was horrible, as illustrated by the mass transit and other strikes. Socialist policies did not encourage young men and women to seek either education or employment. In fact, it actually encouraged them to go on the dole. The giveaways were astounding. Government funded housing, called council housing, proliferated and were the petri dishes in which violence, sloth, and football (soccer) hooliganism bred. It was not a pleasant time to be in England. Then she was elected Prime Minister.
As George Will notes, "When she left office in 1990, the trade unions had been tamed by democratizing them, the political argument was about how to achieve economic growth rather than redistribute wealth, and individualism and nationalism were revitalized."
Does his description of Thatcher's achievements sound appealing? Certainly does to me. Most likely because the same type of issues are upon us.
Somewhere in our great nation, there must be a Margaret Thatcher who can rise to lead the nation back to its greatness and away from the socialist agenda of the current progressive liberals.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)